<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Libertarian Party of Pittsburgh &#187; Candidate Discrimination</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lppgh.org/category/candidate-discrimination/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lppgh.org</link>
	<description>Smaller Government.  Fewer Taxes.  More Freedom.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Jul 2010 01:54:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Republicans anti-Democracy When it Comes to 3rd Party Choice</title>
		<link>http://www.lppgh.org/2008/08/25/republicans-anti-democracy-when-it-comes-to-3rd-party-choice/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lppgh.org/2008/08/25/republicans-anti-democracy-when-it-comes-to-3rd-party-choice/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2008 23:32:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Candidate Discrimination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Candidates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Election 2008]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libertarian]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liberty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pittsburgh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pennsylvania]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bob Barr]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[candidate]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lppgh.org/?p=91</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From the Campaign of Libertarian Candidate for President, Bob Barr:
August 25, 2008      6:32 pm EST

Atlanta, GA &#8211; Bob Barr&#8217;s presidential campaign has recently learned of an action by the McCain campaign and the Pennsylvania Republican Party to have Barr removed from the state&#8217;s ballot, this despite McCain&#8217;s promise in the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="author-date-line"><strong>From the Campaign of Libertarian Candidate for President, Bob Barr:</strong></p>
<p class="author-date-line"><span>August 25, 2008      6:32 pm EST</span></p>
<div id="press-release-content">
<p>Atlanta, GA &#8211; Bob Barr&#8217;s presidential campaign has recently learned of an action by the McCain campaign and the Pennsylvania Republican Party to have Barr removed from the state&#8217;s ballot, this despite McCain&#8217;s promise in the 2000 election that he would, &#8220;never consider, ever consider, allowing a supporter of [his] to challenge [his opponent]&#8217;s right to be on the ballot in all 50 states.&#8221;</p>
<p>In 2000, McCain told reporters, &#8221;Let&#8217;s not have the kind of Stalinist politics that the state of New York, the Republican Party, has been practicing.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;This move by the McCain campaign completely contradicts everything John McCain stood for in 2000 when his competitors were trying to keep him off the ballot,&#8221; says Barr. &#8220;McCain has become a part of the same corrupted machine he spoke vehemently against only eight years ago.&#8221;</p>
<p><strong>&#8220;This is America, where people have a right to run for office and a right to compete for the chance to lead the people of this nation,&#8221; Barr continues. &#8220;I look forward to the chance to compete fairly against Senator McCain for votes in Pennsylvania and every other state.&#8221;</strong></p>
<p>In a recent email to supporters, Barr&#8217;s campaign manager, Russell Verney, stated that McCain&#8217;s attempt to block Barr from the ballot is one &#8220;you might expect of a dictator in North Korea, Libya, China, or Iran.&#8221; Verney, who also was the campaign manager for Ross Perot, called the plot &#8220;a blatantly hypocritical move.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;This move is certainly one of the more brazen attempts to lock me out of the political process,&#8221; explains Barr. &#8220;But it is simply just one more example of how the political establishment desperately clings to their own power instead of empowering the people. The political establishment serves only themselves and not the people of this nation. It is time candidates for the most powerful position in the world compete based on ideas and not dirty politics.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;I challenge Senator McCain to forcefully and publicly instruct his agents to drop the lawsuit,&#8221; says Barr.</p>
<p><span id="more-91"></span>Bob Barr represented the 7th District of Georgia in the U. S. House of Representatives from 1995 to 2003, where he served as a senior member of the Judiciary Committee, as Vice-Chairman of the Government Reform Committee, and as a member of the Committee on Financial Services. Prior to his congressional career, Barr was appointed by President Reagan to serve as the United States Attorney for the Northern District of Georgia, and also served as an official with the CIA. Since leaving Congress, Barr has been practicing law and has teamed up with groups ranging from the American Civil Liberties Union to the American Conservative Union to actively advocate every American citizens’ right to privacy and other civil liberties guaranteed in the Bill of Rights. Along with this, Bob is committed to helping elect leaders who will strive for smaller government, lower taxes and abundant individual freedom.</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lppgh.org/2008/08/25/republicans-anti-democracy-when-it-comes-to-3rd-party-choice/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>You Pay for Their Party</title>
		<link>http://www.lppgh.org/2007/03/27/you-pay-for-their-party/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lppgh.org/2007/03/27/you-pay-for-their-party/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2007 17:42:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Candidate Discrimination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libertarian]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pittsburgh]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lppgh.org/2007/03/27/you-pay-for-their-party/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The $100 million for the political party conventions — $50 million for the Democratic convention in Denver and $50 million for the Republican convention in St. Paul, Minn. — is included in a section described as “Katrina recovery, veterans’ care and for other purposes.”
Isn&#8217;t that nice.  Nothing like lots of pork in a spending [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><em>The $100 million for the political party conventions — $50 million for the Democratic convention in Denver and $50 million for the Republican convention in St. Paul, Minn. — is included in a section described as “Katrina recovery, veterans’ care and for other purposes.”</em></p></blockquote>
<p>Isn&#8217;t that nice.  Nothing like <a href="http://www.examiner.com/a-640957~Senate__emergency__war_bill_has_almost__20_billion_in_domestic_spending_tacked_onto_it.html" target="_blank">lots of pork in a spending bill flying through Congress</a> under the banner of &#8220;supporting our troops.&#8221;  Indeed, it was in the Iraq troop funding bill that this pork is being snuck through.</p>
<p>What&#8217;s most appalling is that taxpayers are forced to support the conventions of PRIVATE political parties. These are NOT government entities. <strong>These are private political parties.</strong></p>
<p>With this kind of money flowing around at taxpayer expense, it is no wonder that the U.S. is confined to a two party system.  Combined with the many restrictive laws that protect the two big parties and their incumbents, 3rd parties are presented with many deliberate hurdles to getting their message out.</p>
<p>Are you tired of this un-American activity?</p>
<p>Why not attend our next meeting or contact us right now?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lppgh.org/2007/03/27/you-pay-for-their-party/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Real Voting Problem: Candidate Discrimination</title>
		<link>http://www.lppgh.org/2006/12/25/real-voting-problem-candidate-discrimination/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lppgh.org/2006/12/25/real-voting-problem-candidate-discrimination/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Dec 2006 20:09:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Candidate Discrimination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Letters to the Editor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[voter choice]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lppgh.org/?p=30</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As published in the PIttsburgh Post Gazette, December 25, 2006
The real voting problem: third-party or independent candidates are shut out
Paper ballots may stop votes disappearing from recounts (&#8221;In Praise of Paper&#8221; by Bruce Schneier, Dec. 3 Forum), but they won&#8217;t stop candidates disappearing from Pennsylvania ballots.
2006 saw no Pennsylvania third party or independent statewide candidates [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As <a href="http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/06359/748680-110.stm" target="_blank">published in the PIttsburgh Post Gazette</a>, December 25, 2006</p>
<p>The real voting problem: third-party or independent candidates are shut out</p>
<p>Paper ballots may stop votes disappearing from recounts (&#8221;In Praise of Paper&#8221; by Bruce Schneier, Dec. 3 Forum), but they won&#8217;t stop candidates disappearing from Pennsylvania ballots.</p>
<p>2006 saw no Pennsylvania third party or independent statewide candidates because unfair rules required <strong><u>over 67,000 ballot access signatures</u></strong>. Major-party statewide nominees needed only their <em><strong>2,000</strong> primary election signatures</em>.</p>
<p>When the Green Party&#8217;s U.S. Senate candidate attempted ballot access, Democratic Party lawyers filed suit resulting in ballot denial and a staggering $1 million fine.</p>
<p>Incumbent parties use law and crippling financial threats to silence candidates who serve us all by bringing uncomfortable topics to political debate. Thus, paper backups won&#8217;t stop disappearing debate from disappearing candidates.</p>
<p>What will? The Voters&#8217; Choice Act.</p>
<p>Since 2005, <a href="http://www.PaBallotAccess.org" target="_blank">PaBallotAccess.org</a>, a coalition of Libertarian, Green, Constitutional, Reform and other parties, has promoted the VCA. It would implement fairer ballot access rules. We need to push this again in the 2007 Legislature.</p>
<p>While unverifiable recounting is a concern, a far greater concern is censoring debate by unfairly prohibiting ballot access.</p>
<p>MARK CROWLEY<br />
Plum</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lppgh.org/2006/12/25/real-voting-problem-candidate-discrimination/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
